Select news item:

Attorney van Schoonhoven reply Ecopetrol’s bulletin NYSE

Attorney van Schoonhoven reply Ecopetrol’s bulletin to NYSE and SEC:

 

Unlike Ecopetrol’s comments that Llanos Oil did not meet its contractual obligations. Ecopetrol approved Llanos Oil for meeting its contractual obligations on 06 February 2003 Llanos and Ministry of Mines approved Llanos Oil’s technical work program 2002 on 17 September 2003.

Contrary to Ecopetrol’s official reply to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Llanos Oil did not loose its court case before The Middle District Court of Florida (and not The Southern District Court as alleged by Ecopetrol). Instead Llanos Oil voluntarily withdrew its case, right after the judge denied Drummond’s four motions “to dismiss”.

Contrary to Ecopetrol’s publication, Ecopertol was not part of the 2005 lawsuit. Instead its then current president and two former officers of Ecopetrol were part of the lawsuit.

Llanos Oil felt that it could not obtain a “Fair Trial” as judge Antoon was also the same judge used in the DEA set up against “Llanos Oil/van Bilderbeeks”.

Contrary to Ecopetrol’s publication, The 7 billion euro claim is 10% advance of damages and not as stated by Ecopetrol the full damages.

February 10, 2011

Show all News